Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Squidex VS Plone

Compare Squidex VS Plone and see what are their differences

Squidex logo Squidex

an OpenSource Headless CMS, a CMS with an API

Plone logo Plone

Plone CMS: Open Source Content Management — Plone.org
  • Squidex Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-02
  • Plone Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-22

Squidex features and specs

  • Headless CMS
    Squidex is a headless CMS, which allows for greater flexibility in delivering content across various platforms and devices by decoupling the backend from the frontend.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, Squidex allows developers to customize and extend the platform to suit their needs and to contribute to the project, fostering a collaborative environment.
  • API-First Approach
    Squidex is built with an API-first approach, meaning all content management functionalities can be accessed via APIs, facilitating straightforward integration with other applications.
  • Real-time Synchronization
    Squidex provides real-time synchronization of content, ensuring that updates are immediately reflected across all platforms and devices, enhancing content delivery efficiency.
  • Versioning and History
    Squidex offers versioning and content history features, allowing users to track changes over time and roll back to previous versions if necessary, which enhances content management.

Possible disadvantages of Squidex

  • Complex Setup for Beginners
    New users might find the initial setup and configuration challenging without prior experience with headless CMS platforms, potentially leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Limited Built-in Templates
    Squidex doesn’t offer as many built-in templates and out-of-the-box solutions compared to some traditional CMS solutions, which may require more development effort for customization.
  • Dependence on Internet Connectivity
    As a cloud-based CMS, Squidex's functionality heavily depends on internet connectivity, which could be a limitation for users in areas with unreliable internet services.
  • Scaling Costs
    While the initial usage might be cost-effective, scaling up with increased usage and storage needs might result in higher costs, especially for users managing large volumes of content.

Plone features and specs

  • Open Source
    Plone is an open-source platform, meaning there are no licensing fees. This can be a substantial cost saver, and it offers flexibility for customization.
  • Security
    Plone is known for its robust security features. It has a strong security track record and a dedicated team focused on maintaining its security posture.
  • Flexibility and Customization
    Plone supports extensive customization of content types, workflows, and permissions, making it highly adaptable to various use cases.
  • Strong Community Support
    Plone has an active community of developers and users who contribute to forums, documentation, and the development of plugins and updates.
  • Scalability
    Plone is capable of handling large amounts of data and traffic, making it suitable for enterprise-level applications.
  • Built-in Features
    Plone comes with a rich set of built-in features including a robust workflow engine, versioning, multilingual support, and content rules.

Possible disadvantages of Plone

  • Complexity
    Plone can be complex to set up and manage, requiring specialized knowledge. This complexity might be a barrier for small teams or projects with limited technical expertise.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its extensive features and flexibility, Plone can have a steep learning curve, potentially requiring a significant investment in training.
  • Limited Plugin Ecosystem
    Compared to other CMS platforms, Plone has a smaller ecosystem of plugins and extensions, which might limit its functionality out-of-the-box.
  • Performance Overhead
    Plone's extensive features and flexibility can result in performance overhead, making it potentially slower than more lightweight CMS options.
  • Hosting Requirements
    Plone has specific hosting requirements, and not all web hosts support it natively. This could require more specialized hosting solutions.
  • Design Limitations
    While Plone allows for extensive backend customization, its theming and design options are comparatively limited and might require additional effort to achieve a modern and appealing UI.

Squidex videos

Eksplore NoCode Tools, Cockpit, Directus, Squidex & dotCMS

Plone videos

Plone - the open source CMS-as-a-service platform: An eGov case study

More videos:

  • Review - Plone Add-On Review #1: Responsive Design for Diazo
  • Review - Plone Workflow

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Squidex and Plone)
CMS
27 27%
73% 73
Blogging
29 29%
71% 71
Blogging Platform
32 32%
68% 68
API-first CMS
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Squidex and Plone. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Squidex and Plone

Squidex Reviews

11 Headless CMS to Consider for Modern Application
Squidex is a powerful open-source software that lets you create and edit content with excellent efficiency.
Source: geekflare.com

Plone Reviews

11 Popular Free And Open Source WordPress CMS alternatives in 2021
Plone is an open-source, enterprise-grade, all-in-one content management system. lightweight free open-source portable photo editor for Microsoft Windows. It has a simple interface similar to Adobe Photoshop.
Source: medevel.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Plone might be a bit more popular than Squidex. We know about 2 links to it since March 2021 and only 2 links to Squidex. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Squidex mentions (2)

Plone mentions (2)

  • What's the experience of using Python to build the backend of a large application?
    Plone and its dependencies codebase is ~200 MB Python code. It's all open source and openly managed, so you can always look up Plone for the best practices for code contribution processes. It is manageable. Legacy code from Python 2.x era is a bit problematic, but anything cleanly written for the latest Python version (3.8+) with type hinting is easy. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Django 3.2 Released
    It’s still alive and still underpins the CMS plone [1]. It has evolved and separated into zope [2] zodb [3] and ztk. [1] https://plone.org [2] https://zone.org [3] https://zodb.org. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Squidex and Plone, you can also consider the following products

Strapi - Manage any content. Anywhere. The leading open-source headless CMS. 100% JavaScript / TypeScript and fully customizable.

Drupal - Drupal - the leading open-source CMS for ambitious digital experiences that reach your audience across multiple channels. Because we all have different needs, Drupal allows you to create a unique space in a world of cookie-cutter solutions.

Contentful - You don't need another CMS. You need a better way to manage content — unified, structured, and ready to deploy to any digital channel.

WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.

Netlify CMS - An open-source CMS for your Git workflow

Joomla - Joomla! is the mobile-ready and user-friendly way to build your website. Choose from thousands of features and designs. Joomla! is free and open source.