It has, but it wasn't adopted by the pragmatists in that time. It's hard to tell if the early adopters adopted it either - It doesn't show up at all in the 2023 stack overflow survey (nor in the previous two years) - https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2023/#technology-most-popular-technologies - It doesn't show up in questions asked on Stackoverflow since 2008 -... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

> In 2017 I had React projects in production for years. I doubt that. React wasn't stable until 2015, and wasn't mainstream until 2016. > And it only got worse and the overengineering to make it looks fast in the first load is not worth it as modern JS frameworks are faster than React out-of-the-box. Again, Next.js != React; the former builds on the latter, it doesn't replace it nor does it claim to be the same... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

> Prior to Next.js, React was hard to setup and maintain No, it wasn't. > I started using Next.js in 2017. It made React a real production framework In 2017 I had React projects in production for years. > React was hard to setup and maintain and hard to make it go fast (on first load) And it only got worse and the overengineering to make it looks fast in the first load is not worth it as modern JS frameworks are... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

Based on what? https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=python%2Cjava. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

Fair enough, my information is outdated. StackOverflow agrees. [1] [1] https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=django%2Cruby-on-rails. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

So, here's what you'll all need to do, report this bot to reddit, and have theverge.com and all other sites as well, ars, wired and so on, to report about this being a "christian" bot, and thus, being a part of the rightwing/alt-right community, and point that finger as that (that might not be true, but it can certainly give the light of it, seeing how /u/spez might have some of them dollars from religious... Source: about 1 year ago

Do you have to cite external sources? What kind of sources can you use? Can you use something like theverge.com or do you have to use something like scientific research papers? Source: about 1 year ago

Use the Add Feed 3 dot menu in the top right to search for feeds to add by site url i.e. theverge.com or npr.org. Source: about 1 year ago

Nothing much to be done about someone dissing e-bikes but if you had the opportunity you could quote this, from theverge.com:. Source: about 1 year ago

"OpenAI has launched a bug bounty, encouraging members of the public to find and disclose vulnerabilities in its AI services including ChatGPT. Rewards range from $200 for “low-severity findings” to $20,000 for “exceptional discoveries,” and reports are submittable via crowdsourcing cybersecurity platform Bugcrowd." (an excerpt from an article from theverge.com). Source: about 1 year ago