star-history Reviews

Maptitude Reviews

star-history mentions (27)

• Ask HN: Why do you all think that Htmx is such a recent development?

  I created the library that would become intercooler.js in 2012 and released it in 2013, based on a mashup of $.load(), pjax & angular attributes. The world at that time was not ready to consider an alternative to the hot new ideas coming out of the big tech companies (angular from google, react from facebook). In 2020 during covid I decided to rewrite intercooler.js w/o the jQuery dependency and rename it to htmx.... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

• Stirling PDF: Self-hosted, web-based PDF manipulation tool

  I have some questions about the Github Star history, it's very unusual to see a ~1 year old with 20k+ stars. It went from 6k to 15k+ stars in a few days around 2023 Christmas when global internet traffic is usually lowest, and I couldn't find any major social media posts or announcements around that time. If you're gonna buy stars don't buy 10k+ stars on one day, spread it out a bit!... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago

• Show HN: I've built a locally running perplexity clone

  That’s a great project you pulled off. From the time I starred it (10-12h ago I think), and upon re-checking this post, you gained 500+ stars lol. Visualized in a chart with star-history: https://star-history.com/#nilsherzig/LLocalSearch. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

• What I learned from looking at 900 most popular open source AI tools

  You can actively see a fresh "hype curve" in the transformer-debugger repo that was posted a couple days ago (https://github.com/openai/transformer-debugger). Regardless of the repo's stars or how valuable it really is, at the time I saw it posted to HN, it had 1.6k stars/16 hours. What channel are people listening to to star it so quickly. I'm not implying any nefariousness, mind you, I'm only wondering where all... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

• What I learned in 6 months of working on a CodeGen dev tool GPT Pilot

  I’ve been releasing open-source projects for years now, and I’ve always wanted to see how fast my Github repo is growing compared to other successful repositories on https://star-history.com/. The problem is that on Star History, I’m unable to zoom into the graph, so a new repo that has 1,000 stars cannot be compared with a big repo that has 50,000 because you can’t see how the bigger repo does in its beginning.... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

Maptitude mentions (0)