Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Static Site Boilerplate VS Create React App

Compare Static Site Boilerplate VS Create React App and see what are their differences

Static Site Boilerplate logo Static Site Boilerplate

A better workflow for building modern static websites.

Create React App logo Create React App

Create React apps with no build configuration
  • Static Site Boilerplate Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-10
  • Create React App Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-18

Static Site Boilerplate features and specs

  • Performance
    Static Site Boilerplate is known for its fast loading times since it serves static files, which can be delivered quickly from a CDN.
  • Security
    Static sites have fewer attack vectors compared to dynamic sites, reducing vulnerabilities like SQL injection and server-side attacks.
  • Scalability
    Static Site Boilerplate inherently supports high scalability because static files can be easily replicated on multiple servers.
  • Simplicity
    The framework is straightforward and simple to use, making it accessible to developers who want to create fast and efficient websites with minimal configuration.
  • No Server-Side Dependency
    Since the output is purely static files, there's no need for any backend infrastructure or server management.

Possible disadvantages of Static Site Boilerplate

  • Limited Dynamic Functionality
    Static Site Boilerplate is not ideal for websites that require server-side processing or real-time dynamic content as it does not support traditional backend server logic.
  • Content Management
    Managing and updating content can be more cumbersome without a content management system (CMS) integrated into the workflow.
  • Build Time
    With large sites, the build process can become time-consuming, as regenerating static files for every change takes time.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    For beginners, the initial setup and understanding of static site generation tools might seem complex compared to using a CMS.
  • Limited Interactivity
    While possible to enhance with JavaScript, static sites inherently don't support highly interactive elements natively without additional scripting.

Create React App features and specs

  • Ease of Setup
    Create React App provides a simple command to quickly set up a new React project. This reduces the time required for initial configuration.
  • Zero Configuration
    The tool comes with a large set of defaults out of the box. You don't need to configure Webpack, Babel, or other build tools manually.
  • Best Practices
    It encapsulates a lot of best practices for building React applications, ensuring you start off on the right foot.
  • Development Server
    Includes a local development server with hot-module reloading powered by Webpack, which improves the development experience.
  • Community Support
    As a Facebook-backed project with a wide user base, Create React App benefits from extensive documentation and community support.
  • Testing Setup
    Initial Jest configuration is included, providing a straightforward way to start writing and running tests.
  • Production Optimizations
    Built-in optimizations for production builds, such as code splitting and minification.

Possible disadvantages of Create React App

  • Limited Customization
    While the zero-configuration approach is convenient, it can be limiting if you need to modify the underlying configurations (Webpack, Babel, etc.).
  • Monolithic
    Create React App is a single monolithic package, which can make it difficult to understand or change certain aspects without ejecting.
  • Eject Complexity
    Ejecting from Create React App exposes all underlying configurations, which can be overwhelming and increase the complexity of your project.
  • Dependency Management
    Because it abstracts away many details, you may not be aware of what dependencies are being used in your project.
  • Less Control
    Advanced users may find Create React App restrictive as it abstracts many details and does not easily allow for deep customization.
  • Performance Overhead
    For very small applications, the built-in tooling might be overkill and add unnecessary complexity and performance overhead.

Static Site Boilerplate videos

No Static Site Boilerplate videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Create React App videos

Why You Should Stop Using Create React App | React.js Todo List | Code Review #4 Part 2

More videos:

  • Review - Create React App Explained

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Static Site Boilerplate and Create React App)
Developer Tools
40 40%
60% 60
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
React
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Static Site Boilerplate and Create React App. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Create React App seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 120 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Static Site Boilerplate mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Static Site Boilerplate yet. Tracking of Static Site Boilerplate recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Create React App mentions (120)

  • Those Golden Era of React...👩‍💻☺️
    This project was bootstrapped with Create React App. - Source: dev.to / 16 days ago
  • You should know this before choosing Next.js
    I could totally see how you'd arrive there. Backstory: create-react was a starter boilerplate for React built and maintained by Facebook. This was when webpack was the standard and just getting a local development environment to "hello world" for React could be challenging.[1] That project was depreciated and the popularity of the Next.js site framework for react projects (plus I certainly assume heavy lobbying... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Updating my website's tech stack in 2025
    My website's previous iteration was built in 2021. It was bootstrapped using (the now deprecated) Create React App and it took approximately 2 months to build. The home page included a bunch of photos that I had taken myself of my desk and keyboard as background for several sections and it included most of the information on the website. In the middle of the page I put the SkillsTerminal (which also features in... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Micro-libraries need to die already
    This is just a discourse based on "I need to churn out something, I need that fast and I didn't start in the web game when Backbone and E4X were a solid corporate choice". If you are not in a hurry, work in a solid team and have a good attention span, a lot of clickbait idiocy around JS may not happen. I'm presenting you one of countless examples: a lot of coding bootcamps teach React, maybe with TS, maybe with... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • 45 NPM Packages to Solve 16 React Problems
    Create-react-app -> Building a single-page application. Good for beginners. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Static Site Boilerplate and Create React App, you can also consider the following products

React Boilerplate - Offline-first, highly scalable foundation for your next app

NativeExpress - The ultimate React Native & Expo boilerplate with everything you need to build, launch, and monetize your mobile app as fast as possible. Including step-by-step submission guides and all the resources you need to submit your app to the stores

GatsbyJS - Blazing-fast static site generator for React

React - A JavaScript library for building user interfaces

React Milkshake - React boilerplate to kickstart your next projects.

Slashdiv - Visual React JS Layout Builder