Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Static Site Boilerplate VS Webpack

Compare Static Site Boilerplate VS Webpack and see what are their differences

Draxlr
Turn SQL Data into Decisions. Build professional dashboards and data visualizations without technical expertise. Easily embed analytics anywhere, receive automated alerts, and discover AI-powered insights all through a straightforward interface. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Static Site Boilerplate logo Static Site Boilerplate

A better workflow for building modern static websites.

Webpack logo Webpack

Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.
  • Static Site Boilerplate Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-10
  • Webpack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-13

Static Site Boilerplate features and specs

  • Performance
    Static Site Boilerplate is known for its fast loading times since it serves static files, which can be delivered quickly from a CDN.
  • Security
    Static sites have fewer attack vectors compared to dynamic sites, reducing vulnerabilities like SQL injection and server-side attacks.
  • Scalability
    Static Site Boilerplate inherently supports high scalability because static files can be easily replicated on multiple servers.
  • Simplicity
    The framework is straightforward and simple to use, making it accessible to developers who want to create fast and efficient websites with minimal configuration.
  • No Server-Side Dependency
    Since the output is purely static files, there's no need for any backend infrastructure or server management.

Possible disadvantages of Static Site Boilerplate

  • Limited Dynamic Functionality
    Static Site Boilerplate is not ideal for websites that require server-side processing or real-time dynamic content as it does not support traditional backend server logic.
  • Content Management
    Managing and updating content can be more cumbersome without a content management system (CMS) integrated into the workflow.
  • Build Time
    With large sites, the build process can become time-consuming, as regenerating static files for every change takes time.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    For beginners, the initial setup and understanding of static site generation tools might seem complex compared to using a CMS.
  • Limited Interactivity
    While possible to enhance with JavaScript, static sites inherently don't support highly interactive elements natively without additional scripting.

Webpack features and specs

  • Modular Bundling
    Webpack efficiently bundles all your modules (JavaScript, CSS, images, etc.) into manageable chunks, minimizing HTTP requests and enhancing load performance.
  • Code Splitting
    It allows splitting your codebase into 'chunks' which can be loaded on demand. This leads to faster initial page loads as only necessary chunks are loaded initially.
  • Hot Module Replacement (HMR)
    HMR allows you to update modules without needing a full refresh. This improves development speed and efficiency as live changes are instantly reflected in the application.
  • Advanced Configuration
    Webpack is highly configurable, accommodating various needs from simple setups to complex, custom configurations, making it versatile for different projects.
  • Strong Plugin Ecosystem
    There is a rich ecosystem of plugins available to extend Webpack's capabilities, such as minification, asset management, and more.
  • Tree Shaking
    Webpack supports tree shaking, a method to eliminate dead code from your bundle, resulting in more efficient, smaller output files.
  • Dependency Management
    It handles dependencies among modules effectively, automatically managing module load order and avoiding conflicts.

Possible disadvantages of Webpack

  • Complex Configuration
    Its extensive configuration options can be overwhelming, particularly for beginners, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Build Time
    Complex configurations and large projects can result in slower build times, impacting development speed.
  • Documentation Issues
    Despite improvements, there are instances where Webpack's documentation might lack clarity, making it harder to find solutions for specific configurations.
  • Overhead for Simple Projects
    For small and simple projects, Webpack might be overkill, adding unnecessary complexity and setup time.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Occasionally, Webpack updates can lead to breaking changes, which may require significant adjustments to your configuration and codebase.

Static Site Boilerplate videos

No Static Site Boilerplate videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Webpack videos

+ Add

Learn Webpack - Full Tutorial for Beginners

More videos:

  • Review - Core Concepts of Webpack
  • Review - Learn Webpack Pt. 6: Cache Busting and Plugins

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Static Site Boilerplate and Webpack)

Static Site Boilerplate

Webpack

Developer Tools
28 28%
Developer Tools
72% 72
Web Application Bundler
0 0%
Web Application Bundler
100% 100
Design Tools
100 100%
Design Tools
0% 0
JS Build Tools
0 0%
JS Build Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Static Site Boilerplate and Webpack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Static Site Boilerplate and Webpack

Static Site Boilerplate Reviews

We have no reviews of Static Site Boilerplate yet.
Be the first one to post

Webpack Reviews

Rollup v. Webpack v. Parcel
Tool Prod Build Time One Prod Build Time Two Prod Build Time Three Prod Build Time Avg Parcel 738.509 s 35.364 s 35.592 s 269.82 avg s Rollup 0.712 s 0.665 s 0.714 s 0.697 avg s Webpack 3.636 s 3.805 s 4.305 s 3.915 avg s
Source: x-team.com
If you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!
document.body.className = document.body.className.replace(/(^|\s)is-noJs(\s|$)/, "$1is-js$2")HomepageHomepageJavascriptBecome a memberSign inGet startedIf you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!And how to hit the ground running with Parcel.Ibrahim ButtBlockedUnblockFollowFollowingMar 16, 2018Click here to share this article on LinkedIn »Zero...
Source: medium.com
First impressions with Parcel JS
From first impressions and experience, my take currently would be as follows. Webpack is generally going to be more flexible. It also places a bit more power in the developers hands to make bundling happen exactly as desired. That isn’t to say you shouldn’t use Parcel though. Where Parcel excels is the fact you don’t configure it. You will still need to configure plugins for...
Source: codeburst.io
Parcel vs webpack - Jakob Lind
Webpack is the stable choice. You will not get fired for picking webpack. But you don’t get as much stuff for free such as optimized bundles, and code splitting.
Source: blog.jakoblind.no

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Webpack seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 243 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Static Site Boilerplate mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Static Site Boilerplate yet. Tracking of Static Site Boilerplate recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Webpack mentions (243)

  • Dark Souls CRUD Arena - The Prisoner Approach
    To then serve to the browser. If I was using something like Vite or Webpack I would have gotten this handling for free. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • You Don’t Know JS Yet: My Weekly Journey Through JavaScript Mastery
    The JS code gets transpiled by tools like Babel, then bundled (often by Webpack) into a single or few files (like bundle.js). This optimizes the website to load faster, as the browser can fetch everything from one file instead of multiple. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Webpack 5: The Next Generation Module Bundler
    Remember that Webpack is highly configurable, and this article only scratches the surface of what's possible. Be sure to check the official Webpack documentation for more detailed information and advanced configurations. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Discover the power of microfrontends: A revolution in frontend development
    With Webpack 5, a new feature has helped microfrontends proliferate: Module Federation. Module Federation allows JavaScript code to be loaded — synchronously or asynchronously — at runtime. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Which JavaScript Bundler Is Right for You? A Deep Dive into Webpack, Vite, and More
    Webpack is one of the oldest and most widely used bundlers in web development, created by Tobias Koppers in 2012. It gained popularity after Browserify and RequireJS and has become the go-to choice for managing complex projects. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Static Site Boilerplate and Webpack, you can also consider the following products

React Boilerplate - Offline-first, highly scalable foundation for your next app

rollup.js - Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into a larger piece such as application.

React Milkshake - React boilerplate to kickstart your next projects.

Parcel - Blazing fast, zero configuration web application bundler

Nebo - No-code visual builder for React front end

Babel - Babel is a compiler for writing next generation JavaScript.

Loading...