Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

stenciljs VS WebComponents.dev

Compare stenciljs VS WebComponents.dev and see what are their differences

stenciljs logo stenciljs

A toolchain for building reusable, scalable Design Systems.

WebComponents.dev logo WebComponents.dev

The modern IDE for web platform developers
  • stenciljs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-08
  • WebComponents.dev Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-11

stenciljs features and specs

  • Web standards compliance
    StencilJS generates Web Components that are compliant with the latest web standards, ensuring better future-proofing and compatibility across all browsers.
  • Performance
    StencilJS optimizes components and leverages lazy loading, reducing the initial load time and improving the overall performance of the application.
  • Reusability
    The component-based architecture allows for greater reusability of components across different projects and frameworks, promoting the DRY principle.
  • TypeScript support
    StencilJS is built with TypeScript, providing strong typing, advanced code refactor capabilities, and error detection at compile time.
  • Simple API
    StencilJS offers a simple and intuitive API that reduces the complexity of managing component state and lifecycle, making development more straightforward.
  • Native Frameworks Integration
    Stencil components can be easily integrated into popular frameworks like React, Angular, and Vue, offering great flexibility for developers.
  • Small bundle size
    Due to its efficient compiler and tree-shaking capabilities, StencilJS produces smaller bundle sizes, contributing to faster load times and better performance.

Possible disadvantages of stenciljs

  • Learning curve
    Though StencilJS is simpler than some alternatives, developers accustomed to other frameworks might face a learning curve adapting to its paradigms.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    The StencilJS community and ecosystem are not as extensive as more established frameworks like React or Angular, which could limit the availability of third-party libraries and resources.
  • SEO challenges
    Web Components can pose challenges for SEO, as search engines might not index content rendered inside Shadow DOM correctly without server-side rendering or pre-rendering.
  • Limited Official Documentation
    Although StencilJS has official documentation, it is not as extensive as other frameworks', making it harder to find in-depth information on advanced use cases.
  • Browser compatibility issues
    While Web Components are becoming more widely supported, there might still be inconsistencies or issues with older browsers that need to be managed via polyfills.
  • Complex state management
    StencilJS lacks a built-in state management solution, which means developers may need to integrate third-party libraries or develop custom solutions for complex state handling.

WebComponents.dev features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    WebComponents.dev provides a streamlined platform to create, share, and experiment with web components without needing extensive configuration or setup. This lowers the barrier to entry for both new and experienced developers.
  • Component Library
    The platform includes a rich library of pre-built components and templates, enabling developers to quickly find and integrate components into their projects.
  • Collaborative Environment
    WebComponents.dev supports collaboration by allowing developers to share their components with others easily. This fosters community engagement and learning opportunities.
  • Integration with Popular Frameworks
    It supports integration with popular frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular, making it versatile and useful for developers working across different ecosystems.

Possible disadvantages of WebComponents.dev

  • Limited Customization
    While WebComponents.dev offers many features for component development and sharing, the platform’s environment might limit some advanced customization possibilities compared to traditional development setups.
  • Dependence on the Platform
    Projects heavily reliant on WebComponents.dev might face challenges if the platform experiences downtime or significant changes, as they are dependent on a third-party service for their development workflow.
  • Performance Overhead
    Developing and running components within a browser-based IDE might introduce performance overheads not present in local development environments.
  • Learning Curve for New Users
    While designed to be user-friendly, there might be a learning curve for developers unfamiliar with web components or the specific paradigms of WebComponents.dev.

stenciljs videos

Amava coração de frango

WebComponents.dev videos

No WebComponents.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to stenciljs and WebComponents.dev)
Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
JavaScript Framework
85 85%
15% 15
Development Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using stenciljs and WebComponents.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, stenciljs should be more popular than WebComponents.dev. It has been mentiond 48 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

stenciljs mentions (48)

  • The Caveats of Web Components
    This works but it's not a good idea to create these manually. Since that creates a lot of maintenance and we can run into out of sync issues with the api. To make this less tedious. Both Lit (see here) and Stencil (see here) provide a cli to create these automatically. However the need to create these wrapper components in the first place is additional overhead. If the framework of your choice properly supports... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Integrating Stencil Web Components in Angular Project
    What is Stencil.js? Stencil is an open-source compiler that generates standards-compliant web components. It builds highly performant, reusable components that can be used with any JavaScript framework or library. Created by the Ionic team, Stencil combines the best features of popular frameworks like Angular, React, and Vue, providing a simple and efficient way to build custom elements. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Getting Started with Mitosis: Creating a Cross-Framework Design System
    Although web components offer a modular and reusable approach to UI elements, these challenges can limit their viability. However, if supporting web components is a requirement, you can use Mitosis to generate them from a single source of truth. Mitosis supports Stencil, Lit, and raw web components as outputs. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • We needed to run maintenance queries (SQL) with user input
    I chose Stencil as my tool for building the UI. Stencil is a great framework for creating custom UIs and web apps using TypeScript, which transpiles into native web components with minimal dependencies. Having used Stencil for the past 4-5 years, I found it to be in the sweet spot: powerful enough to build robust web apps from scratch, yet simple enough to avoid overwhelming complexity when creating custom... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Demystifying Web Components
    Consider adopting something like Lit or Stencil to build Web Components. These frameworks provide standard utilities for working with Web Components and handle everyday tasks such as change detection, server-side rendering, localization, etc. I've personally worked with Lit and find it helpful for preventing common mistakes and pitfalls. Additionally, they provide a series of best practices for authoring... - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
View more

WebComponents.dev mentions (9)

  • Painless Web Components: Naming is (not too) Hard
    How the tag name gets into your code can vary based on the method you are using to write your components. If you load up a few of the templates over on WebComponents.dev you'll see that many examples just use a string value typed into the define function directly. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • free-for.dev
    WebComponents.dev — In-browser IDE to code web components in isolation with 58 templates available, supporting stories and tests. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Why Atomico js webcomponents?
    We will show the benefits of Atomico through a comparison, we have used as a basis for this comparison the existing counter webcomponents in webcomponents.dev of Atomico, Lit, Preact and React as a base. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Javascript animation in LWC, tried Motion one
    Unfortunately, I couldn't get this to work in the online LWC editor https://webcomponents.dev So assuming this also won't work in the shadow DOM enviroment of SF? Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Cute Solar System with CSS
    WebComponentsDev have a lot of libraries and info (like codesandbox, but webcomponents land): Https://webcomponents.dev/. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing stenciljs and WebComponents.dev, you can also consider the following products

Svelte - Cybernetically enhanced web apps

Arbiter IDE - The offline-friendly, in-browser IDE for pure JS prototypes

Preact.js - Preact is a fast 3kB alternative to React with the same modern API. Components & Virtual DOM.

Deco IDE - Best IDE for building React Native apps

Vue.js - Reactive Components for Modern Web Interfaces

CodeOnline - A remote and secure workspace powered by VSCode