Based on our record, Tape should be more popular than Screencast-O-Matic. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Last but not least important are ava, uvu and tape; they are a really light and fast test runners. Source: over 1 year ago
OK will do. Do you have any tips on finding a suitable project? Ideally I was hoping to to contribute to a piece of software that I actually use/know/like/want to improve. Given that, and my area of expertise, I had shortlisted Signal Desktop, and Tape. Source: over 1 year ago
Reactjs I have the following components: // Hello.jsexport default (React) => ({name}) => { return ( Hello {name ? Name : 'Stranger'}! )}// App.jsimport createHello from './Hello'export default (React) => () => { const Hello = createHello(React) const helloProps = { name: 'Jane' } return ( )}// index.jsimport React from 'react'import { render } from 'react-dom'import createApp from... Source: about 2 years ago
For us at Begin and Architect, tape has been in use for several years. Tape has a stable and straightforward API, routine maintenance updates, and outputs TAP, making it really versatile. While TAP is legible, it's not the most human-readable format. Fortunately, several TAP reporters can help display results for developers. Until recently, Begin's TAP reporter of choice was tap-spec. Sadly tap-spec wasn't kept up... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
I really enjoy Ava [1] or anything assert-tape-like [2]. "uvu" [3] is getting a lot of love lately, but it's very feature limited and much of it's touted advantages are at the detriment to feature set. [1] https://github.com/avajs/ava [2] https://github.com/substack/tape [3] https://github.com/lukeed/uvu Jest is great for front-end (or full stack integration) testing, but I feel it's specialized for that use-case... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
A web search for open source screen recorder is a good starting point, but I like a low priced product/service: Https://screencast-o-matic.com/. Source: over 1 year ago
Pro tip: Use Screen O Matic or any screen recording software when taking interview screeners! Source: over 1 year ago
I also used Screencast-O-Matic (https://screencast-o-matic.com/) but it's paid. It also comes with a simple video editor which helped me a lot back in the day. Source: almost 2 years ago
Might be best if you do a screen capture for a few seconds or show. Check out https://screencast-o-matic.com. Can take a video of just your task manager window and share it out. Source: almost 2 years ago
It is easy to record your anything on your screen. I've used this web based screen recorder lots of times. https://screencast-o-matic.com/. Source: over 2 years ago
Mocha - Sponsors. Use Mocha at Work? Ask your manager or marketing team if they'd help support our project. Your company's logo will also be displayed on npmjs. com and our GitHub repository.
OBS Studio - Free and open source software for video recording and live streaming for Mac, Windows and Linux.
Jasmine - Behavior-Driven JavaScript
Camtasia - Camtasia 2018 makes it easy to record your screen and create polished, professional-looking videos.
Loom - Loom is a screen recording extension for Chrome that gives people the ability to create and share media. Create your own videos using your camera, screen view, and audio. Read more about Loom.
BandiCam - Bandicam is a screen recording platform built to accommodate the needs of a wide variety of different users.