Audulus might be a bit more popular than Thunkable. We know about 10 links to it since March 2021 and only 7 links to Thunkable. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
OP you don't need to know coding at all to make app. Try something like App Inventor Thunkable. Source: over 1 year ago
What do you think will be the best mobile app builder no code in 2023? a) Adalo b) Flutterflow c) Moxly d) Thunkable e) Glide 2. Why do you think that will be the case? 3. What are the benefits of using a mobile app builder no code? 4. Do you have any experience using a mobile app builder no code? If so, what was your experience like? 5. Do you think more people will start using mobile app builders no... Source: over 1 year ago
Thunkable is a no-code tool designed specifically for building native mobile apps. Features include drag-and-drop components, advanced logic, native mobile app functionality, and easy publication. Thunkable apps can be directly published from the platform to the Apple App Store, Google Play Store, or the web. Source: over 2 years ago
I had ideas to build an app, and made few 2 years ago or so. Indeed these technologies are great to start with. I would suggest going with Kodular.io or thunkable.com instead of appinventor. There are many pros of using these, cuz I've personally used them to build stuff I can say go with either of the two. They are completely free to start with. Source: almost 3 years ago
For the app maybe you could use something like https://thunkable.com/. Perhaps you could try something like https://firebase.google.com/ for the backend not sure if it is to technical, not used either of the tools myself. Source: almost 3 years ago
Under disadvantages: > You can also call the layout code twice (once to get the size, once to do the interaction), but that is not only more expensive, it's also complex to implement, and in some cases twice is not enough. Egui never does this. I've found multi-pass imgui to work totally fine, and I use it for one of my apps [1]. I can support hstack and vstack layouts which IIRC egui can't. There is added expense... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
The article matches my experience with SwiftUI [1][2]. For example, AFAICT, it's not really possible to write a usable node-graph editor using SwiftUI due to layout and dependency analysis overhead. You have to put the entire node graph inside a Canvas and do your own event handling, which is what we did here [3]. UIKit and AppKit aren't slow though, and Apple has every incentive to make this faster (they wrote... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
This is from 2013. The current version of Audulus can easily generate a waveform from an equation https://audulus.com. Source: about 1 year ago
I'm currently using Lua as an extension language in my app. Users can write their own custom UIs and DSP code. https://audulus.com. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
For some interesting ideas on the SW end, you might find it interesting to get some ideas from Audulus… https://audulus.com/. Source: about 1 year ago
Bubble.io - Building tech is slow and expensive. Bubble is the most powerful no-code platform for creating digital products.
Acapella Extractor - Isolate vocals from any song for free
MIT App Inventor - App Inventor is a cloud-based tool, which means you can create apps for phones or tablets right in your web browser.
Melody ML - Easily separate audio tracks using machine learning
Kodular - Much more than a modern app creator without coding
BeatStyle - A mobile recording studio!