Based on our record, Hugo seems to be a lot more popular than Thunkable. While we know about 358 links to Hugo, we've tracked only 7 mentions of Thunkable. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
OP you don't need to know coding at all to make app. Try something like App Inventor Thunkable. Source: over 1 year ago
What do you think will be the best mobile app builder no code in 2023? a) Adalo b) Flutterflow c) Moxly d) Thunkable e) Glide 2. Why do you think that will be the case? 3. What are the benefits of using a mobile app builder no code? 4. Do you have any experience using a mobile app builder no code? If so, what was your experience like? 5. Do you think more people will start using mobile app builders no... Source: over 1 year ago
Thunkable is a no-code tool designed specifically for building native mobile apps. Features include drag-and-drop components, advanced logic, native mobile app functionality, and easy publication. Thunkable apps can be directly published from the platform to the Apple App Store, Google Play Store, or the web. Source: over 2 years ago
I had ideas to build an app, and made few 2 years ago or so. Indeed these technologies are great to start with. I would suggest going with Kodular.io or thunkable.com instead of appinventor. There are many pros of using these, cuz I've personally used them to build stuff I can say go with either of the two. They are completely free to start with. Source: almost 3 years ago
For the app maybe you could use something like https://thunkable.com/. Perhaps you could try something like https://firebase.google.com/ for the backend not sure if it is to technical, not used either of the tools myself. Source: almost 3 years ago
This required me to revisit my Hugo website. I opened up the developer tools in Edge to figure out which section was which to decide where I wanted to place my hit counter. - Source: dev.to / 26 days ago
I am not a front-end web developer, and UI/UX design is not one of my skills. So, rather than fumble around trying to make my resume webpage look good, I decided to use a static website generator. I chose to use Hugo, since they have a lot of templates to choose from. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Hugo Existing themes will get you a website quick, such that you only have to modify color schemes and layouts. - Source: dev.to / 30 days ago
And last but not least, Netlify, which is the one I use to host this website(for free). Hugo + Netlify is a powerful combination. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
At one point though I realized there is a scaling problem with my build minutes. I knew that golang has considerably faster builds and in my case the easy fix is swapping over to Hugo. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Bubble.io - Building tech is slow and expensive. Bubble is the most powerful no-code platform for creating digital products.
Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.
MIT App Inventor - App Inventor is a cloud-based tool, which means you can create apps for phones or tablets right in your web browser.
Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.
Kodular - Much more than a modern app creator without coding
WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.