No SQLPage - Build SQL-only websites videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, SQLPage - Build SQL-only websites should be more popular than Travis CI. It has been mentiond 20 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
We used Travis CI for our continuous integration (CI) pipeline. Travis is a highly popular CI on Github and its build matrix feature is useful for repositories which contain multiple projects like Grab's. We configured Travis to do the following:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
CI/CD for autobuild + autotests (Codemagic or Travis CI). Source: over 1 year ago
Step 2: Log on to Travis CI and sign up with your GitHub account used above. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Some other hosted CI products, such as CircleCI and Travis Cl, are completely hosted in the cloud. It is becoming more popular for small organizations to use hosted CI products, as they allow engineering teams to begin continuous integration as soon as possible. Source: almost 3 years ago
1. Let's create the account. Access the site https://travis-ci.com/ and click on the button Sign up. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
This article resonates with me. I do love "mildly dynamic websites", and have fond memories of my days hacking together PHP websites 15 years ago. And what I am working on today might be called a bridge for the "dynamicity gap". I'm making an open source server to write web apps entirely in SQL ( https://sql.ophir.dev/ ). It has the "one file per page" logic of PHP, and makes it easy to add bits of dynamic... - Source: Hacker News / 13 days ago
Saving a few clicks for readers: Project page: https://sql.ophir.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
I am currently looking for a solution to run automated tests on a sql website generator I am working on ( https://sql.ophir.dev ) I wanted to use hurl (https://hurl.dev/), but Bruno's UI seems to be useful while developing the tests... Has someone tried both ? Which is better for automated testing, including when the response type is html and not json? - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Full fledged BI tools like Superset and Metabase are amazing for their intended use cases. But they may be an overkill if your primary use case is to infrequently build semi-interactive reports for non-technical end-users and your use cases are are mostly covered by standard graphs & tables. Esp. So if you are familiar with SQL and have access to the underlying data source. Two nifty utilities I have found to be... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
I feel obligated to add a shameless plug here. The idea is very close to a project I presented at pgconf.eu last week: SQLPage https://sql.ophir.dev/ SQLPage has the same goal as postgrest+htmx, but is a little bit higher level. It let's you build your application using prepackaged components you can invoke directly from SQL, without having to write any HTML, CSS, or JS. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development
Postgres.js - Postgres.js - The Fastest full featured PostgreSQL client for Node.js - porsager/postgres
CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.
htmx - high power tools for HTML
Codeship - Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.
Gio UI - Gio is an open source library for creating portable, immediate mode GUI programs for Android, iOS, Linux, Windows, macOS.