Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

VoiceAttack VS Converse.JS

Compare VoiceAttack VS Converse.JS and see what are their differences

monday.com
The most intuitive platform to manage projects and teamwork featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

VoiceAttack logo VoiceAttack

VoiceAttack will take commands that you speak into your microphone

Converse.JS logo Converse.JS

A free and open-source chat client for your website
  • VoiceAttack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-17
  • Converse.JS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-28

VoiceAttack videos

+ Add

Elite Dangerous VoiceAttack FIRST LOOK (NOT a Tutorial)

Converse.JS videos

+ Add

Real-Time Chat on the Web How to use XMPP and Converse.js to integrate webchat into any website

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to VoiceAttack and Converse.JS)

VoiceAttack

Converse.JS

Knowledge Sharing
100 100%
Knowledge Sharing
0% 0
Customer Support
0 0%
Customer Support
100% 100
Speech Recognition And Processing
100 100%
Speech Recognition And Processing
0% 0
Help Desk
0 0%
Help Desk
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using VoiceAttack and Converse.JS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Converse.JS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

VoiceAttack mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of VoiceAttack yet. Tracking of VoiceAttack recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Converse.JS mentions (9)

  • An actually private messaging self hosted server
    I agree. IMHO the best variant is then to use something that is truely free. Like XMPP. There are a lot of servers and many clients to chose from and I can strongly recommend converse.js as a web client. It supports different ways of end to end encryption but I would recommend OMEMO which is basically the same encryption idea that you find in Signal. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Xmpp Bot with its own address.
    Hello, I recently started exploring xmpp, with snikket app and conversejs.org. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Matrix was worth the effort to self host.
    It is Converse.js (https://conversejs.org/) packaged into a one-click install for openfire (from the web admin). So, one-click install for an xmpp web client. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: What is your recommended stack for real time chat?
    My choice, because it's the stack I know very well, would be Prosody ( https://prosody.im/ - I'm one of the devs) and a web client such as Converse.js ( https://conversejs.org/ ). XMPP is highly extensible, Prosody is highly modular, which make them a good foundation for building on top of. That said, the right stack is generally the one that matches your requirements, and (if this isn't primarily a learning... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • No white list registering with conversejs.org
    Tried to register with conversejs.org today and got an error "your IP is not whitelisted". Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing VoiceAttack and Converse.JS, you can also consider the following products

VoiceMacro - Control applications or games by voice commands and/or by the press of a keyboard, mouse button or...

tawk.to - tawk.to is a free live chat app that lets you monitor and chat with visitors on your website or from a free customizable page

VoiceBot - Take command of your games with your voice using VoiceBot!

Rocket.Chat - Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework.

Rhasspy - Rhasspy transforms voice commands into JSON events that can trigger actions in home automation software.

Lets Chat - Open source self-hosted chat app for small teams

Loading...