WebComponents.dev
Arbiter IDE
Deco IDE
CodeOnline
Minze.dev
Vite
WebTestIt
Judge0 IDE
Warrant
authzed
Cerbos
Aserto
Oso
SpeedIn
Permify
Ory
WebComponents.dev WarrantNo WebComponents.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Warrant should be more popular than WebComponents.dev. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
How the tag name gets into your code can vary based on the method you are using to write your components. If you load up a few of the templates over on WebComponents.dev you'll see that many examples just use a string value typed into the define function directly. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
WebComponents.dev — In-browser IDE to code web components in isolation with 58 templates available, supporting stories and tests. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
We will show the benefits of Atomico through a comparison, we have used as a basis for this comparison the existing counter webcomponents in webcomponents.dev of Atomico, Lit, Preact and React as a base. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
Unfortunately, I couldn't get this to work in the online LWC editor https://webcomponents.dev So assuming this also won't work in the shadow DOM enviroment of SF? Source: about 3 years ago
WebComponentsDev have a lot of libraries and info (like codesandbox, but webcomponents land): Https://webcomponents.dev/. Source: about 3 years ago
I think one major difference between the Zanzibar implementations that are out there is support for the 'zookie' consistency token (as mentioned in the original paper). OpenFGA afaik doesn't implement zookies yet[1]. With zookies, each permission write generates a unique token that represents that particular write. Clients can store that token (per resource) and optionally provide it during runtime checks to... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
Warrant — Hosted enterprise-grade authorization and access control service for your apps. The free tier includes 1 million monthly API requests and 1,000 authz rules. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
The specific challenge with authz in the app layer is that different apps can have different access models with varying complexity, especially the more granular you get (e.g. Implementing fine grained access to specific objects/resources - like Google Docs). Personally, I think a rebac (relationship/graph based) approach works best for apps because permissions in applications are mostly relational and/or... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Let's use warrant.dev as an example. The system provides a set of REST APIs for you to define object types and access policies (called warrants). The general process is first to create object types using HTTP POST:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Https://warrant.dev/ (Provider) Relatively new authZ provider, they have a dashboard where you can manage your rules in a central location and then use them from multiple languages via their SDKs, even on the client to perform UI checks. Rules can also be managed programmatically via SDK. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Arbiter IDE - The offline-friendly, in-browser IDE for pure JS prototypes
authzed - The platform to store, compute, and validate app permissions
Deco IDE - Best IDE for building React Native apps
Cerbos - Cerbos helps teams separate their authorization process from their core application code, making their authorization system more scalable, more secure and easier to change as the application evolves.
CodeOnline - A remote and secure workspace powered by VSCode
Aserto - Fine-grained, scalable authorization in minutes