Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Webpacker VS Wispberry

Compare Webpacker VS Wispberry and see what are their differences

Webpacker logo Webpacker

Use Webpack to manage app-like JavaScript modules in Rails - rails/webpacker

Wispberry logo Wispberry

Review your everyday
  • Webpacker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-27
  • Wispberry Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-08-22

Webpacker videos

RailsConf 2020 CE - Webpacker, It-Just-Works, But How? by Justin Gordon

More videos:

  • Review - Should you use React with Webpacker in your Rails project? Rails MVC vs Single Page App (SPA)!

Wispberry videos

No Wispberry videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Webpacker and Wispberry)
Web Application Bundler
100 100%
0% 0
Online Shopping
0 0%
100% 100
JS Build Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Consumer Internet
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Webpacker and Wispberry. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Webpacker seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 17 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Webpacker mentions (17)

  • React + Ruby on Rails without any gems
    We will use Webpacker or JavaScript compiler and assets management. By following the webpacker installation guide, let’s add Webpacker and React to our application. - Source: dev.to / 27 days ago
  • Collecting JavaScript code coverage with Capybara in Ruby on Rails application
    For example, there is a Ruby on Rails application that uses Webpacker and has JavaScript files that are covered by the system tests. Capybara is used as the system testing tool. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Asset Pipeline JS Migration
    Using Webpacker in Rails provides several advantages over the traditional asset pipeline. First, Webpacker uses JavaScript modules, which allows for better code organization and improved code reusability. Second, it offers modern frontend build tools, such as Babel and PostCSS, for transforming and compiling assets. Third, it provides faster build times and faster runtime performance through code splitting and... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Thank you Webpacker, Goodbye Webpacker
    This article is replace Webpacker with Simpacker and webpack. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • How to setup ruby on rails + Angular
    In ruby ​​on rails 7 what is the best way to properly install Angular because I can't find any documentation about it. The only tutorial that exists uses webpacker (https://github.com/rails/webpacker) but unfortunately it is no longer supported and no longer up to date in terms of security. Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

Wispberry mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Wispberry yet. Tracking of Wispberry recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Webpacker and Wispberry, you can also consider the following products

Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.

Typical Contents - Wirecutter for clothes

Pingy CLI - Making Modern Websites Should Be Easier. Pingy is Here To Help.

Fondoodler - Hot glue gun for cheese, by BuzzFeed 🧀

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

BuzzFeed - BuzzFeed is an independent media company that creates articles for various purposes. BuzzFeed has a news section and is building a reputation as a journalistic outfit. Read more about BuzzFeed.