Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

whatdevsneed VS Animate.css

Compare whatdevsneed VS Animate.css and see what are their differences

whatdevsneed logo whatdevsneed

This is whatdevsneed.

Animate.css logo Animate.css

Animate.css is a cross-browser library of CSS animations.
  • whatdevsneed Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-30
  • Animate.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-06

whatdevsneed features and specs

  • Curated Resources
    WhatDevsNeed offers a curated selection of resources specifically targeted at developers, which can help in finding relevant tools and information quickly.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform provides a clean and easy-to-navigate interface, allowing users to efficiently find and use the resources they need without any hassle.
  • Regular Updates
    The site is updated regularly, ensuring that developers have access to the latest tools and resources in the tech industry.
  • Community Driven
    WhatDevsNeed incorporates community feedback and suggestions, making it adaptable to the needs of its user base.

Possible disadvantages of whatdevsneed

  • Limited Scope
    WhatDevsNeed may not cover all topics or technologies developers might be interested in, potentially limiting its usefulness for some users.
  • Subscription Requirement
    Some features or content may require a subscription or account sign-up, which could be a barrier for users who prefer free resources.
  • Overwhelming Options
    The vast array of resources could be overwhelming for newcomers or developers who are unsure of what they specifically need.
  • Dependence on External Content
    As the platform relies on linking to external resources, there is a dependency on the availability and reliability of third-party websites.

Animate.css features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Animate.css provides a wide range of preset animations that can be easily implemented by adding class names to HTML elements. This eliminates the need for custom CSS animations or JavaScript, thus saving time and effort.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    The animations in Animate.css work across all modern browsers, ensuring a consistent and reliable experience for users regardless of the browser they use.
  • Open Source
    Animate.css is an open-source library, meaning it's free to use and contributions from the community help keep it updated and improve its functionality over time.
  • Lightweight
    The library is relatively lightweight, especially if you only include the specific animations you need, which helps keep page load times low.
  • Customizable
    Although it comes with a wide range of preset animations, Animate.css allows for customization. Developers can easily modify the CSS to fit their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of Animate.css

  • Limited to CSS Animations
    Animate.css only includes CSS-based animations. For more complex interactions or animations that require JavaScript, another library or custom code would be necessary.
  • Overhead for Unused Animations
    By importing the entire library, you might include many animations that are not used, leading to unnecessary overhead. Selective imports or custom builds are required to avoid this.
  • Performance
    Frequent or complex animations can lead to performance issues, especially on lower-end devices. Developers need to be mindful of how often animations are triggered and their impact on performance.
  • Limited Control
    Using pre-defined animations means less control over specific nuances of the animations. For more intricate or highly customized animations, a more flexible solution may be needed.
  • Potential Conflicts
    There can be potential conflicts with existing CSS in your project, especially if the same class names are used, leading to unintended side effects.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to whatdevsneed and Animate.css)
Developer Tools
46 46%
54% 54
Design Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Spreadsheets
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using whatdevsneed and Animate.css. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Animate.css seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

whatdevsneed mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of whatdevsneed yet. Tracking of whatdevsneed recommendations started around Sep 2021.

Animate.css mentions (1)

  • 3 Easy Ways to Add Animation to your Angular Applications
    An advantage of this approach is that it lets us utilize any CSS animation library that works off of the same concept of adding and removing classes. Some of the more popular libraries that work this way are animate.css and magic.css. Chris Coyier has an amazing article on CSS Tricks that lists more of these if you are interested. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing whatdevsneed and Animate.css, you can also consider the following products

LaunchKit - Open Source - A popular suite of developer tools, now 100% open source.

Material UI - A CSS Framework and a Set of React Components that Implement Google's Material Design

SmallDevTools - Handy developer tools with a delightful interface

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Profitable developer tools database - A database of 103+ hand-curated profitable developer tools

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library