Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

WinPcap VS iperf

Compare WinPcap VS iperf and see what are their differences

WinPcap logo WinPcap

Industry-standard tool for link-layer network access in Windows.

iperf logo iperf

A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool
  • WinPcap Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-29
  • iperf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-17

WinPcap videos

winpcap vs npcap

iperf videos

Using Iperf to measure network speed / bandwidth

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to use iperf to test local network LAN speed in Windows 10
  • Review - [HOWTO] Test My Network Speed?! [iPerf & JPerf]

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to WinPcap and iperf)
Monitoring Tools
17 17%
83% 83
Security & Privacy
100 100%
0% 0
Log Management
0 0%
100% 100
Web Scraping
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using WinPcap and iperf. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare WinPcap and iperf

WinPcap Reviews

5 Best Wireshark alternative packet sniffers
The program includes a collector. However, this native system isn’t very effective and it is more usual to install WinPcap to gather packets. Packets get captured on demand — you turn the capture on and then off in the console. The top pane of the console shows connections between computers. When you click on one of these records, the traffic of that connection displays in...

iperf Reviews

We have no reviews of iperf yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, iperf seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

WinPcap mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of WinPcap yet. Tracking of WinPcap recommendations started around Mar 2021.

iperf mentions (4)

  • Microsoft: Don't Use Iperf3 on Windows
    Just some clarification: IPerf 2 is different from the iperf3 found at https://github.com/esnet/iperf. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Yet Another Bench Script (YABS): evaluate Linux server performance with this simple Bash script and utility
    Network - network throughput (both incoming and outgoing) is tested using iperf3 on several geographically diverse public iperf servers. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Speed testing Visible with a modem
    File transfer using iperf3 over Tailscale. I noticed that the bandwidth to my home computer (on a 500/500 fiber connection) was higher than with speedtest.net. For the first few days I was getting downloads and uploads of 28Mbps (+/- std dev of 6Mbps) and 150ms latency (+/- 35ms). After somewhere around 100GB total transfer (maybe half of that over Tailscale), it is now downloading and uploading at 10Mbps (+/-... Source: over 2 years ago
  • FTP upload speed isn't great
    I can add to this. I have two mini self contained projects to create multiarch static bins of mtr and iperf3 for general usage. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing WinPcap and iperf, you can also consider the following products

Win10Pcap - Win10Pcap is a WinPcap-based Ethernet packet capture library.

JPerf - This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.

Npcap - Npcap is the Nmap Project's packet sniffing library for Windows.

Wireshark - Wireshark is a network protocol analyzer for Unix and Windows. It lets you capture and interactively browse the traffic running on a computer network.

mtr - mtr combines the functionality of the 'traceroute' and 'ping' programs in a single...

clumsy - clumsy makes your network condition on Windows significantly worse, but in a managed and...