Based on our record, Astro Build should be more popular than Pinegrow. It has been mentiond 188 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I've been using Astro recently to build mostly static sites. Currently, I'm working on a server-side rendered (SSR), semi-complex website. Since Astro is so enjoyable to use, I chose it for this project. This post sheds light on a subtle but important aspect of using Astro with SSR enabled and Astro DB that isn't immediately apparent from the documentation—and the solution. - Source: dev.to / 1 day ago
This component leverages Astro to dynamically generate a resume in HTML format based on the user's information. A subsequent automated process within GitHub Actions converts the HTML to PDF and ensures its deployment to both GitHub artifacts and Cloudflare. - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago
If you are using this project for learning you may want to consider something like Astro: https://astro.build/ It will enable you to dabble in building different pages/routes in different frameworks very easily. - Source: Hacker News / 4 days ago
I had a very similar experience a few years ago and decided to switch from Next to Astro [0]. [0] https://astro.build/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 days ago
Astro [0] a relatively new static site generator. It solves all of the issues I've had with SSG's that feel heavy, like Gatsby. Astro only as complex as you make it. It lets you write JSX-like syntax that compiles to static HTML. I use it for my personal site. [0]: https://astro.build/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 days ago
Check Pinegrow. It's perfect builder for someone who know how to code. You will need to get used to it, but once you are familiar with it, its super great :) Https://pinegrow.com/. Source: about 1 year ago
Figma is a design/prototyping tool. So probably yes, but it's not directly resolving your end result. Webflow is SaaS, specifically a visual builder for websites. The two are not really comparable in which to choose. A better comparison would be Figma or XD. And for Webflow, something like Pinegrow, or CofeeCup's Responsive Site Designer. Would be better comparisons. Source: about 1 year ago
5+ year web flow dev here! i’ve been heavily contemplating a move to pinegrow or the “open source webflow” webstudio. Source: about 1 year ago
I also don't have much experience with DW but something that I have seen do similar stuff is pinegrow which is quite cheaper. It has free trial so maybe you could see if it will fit your needs. Source: over 1 year ago
Pinegrow is pretty awesome and free and something I'm increasingly working with. Source: over 1 year ago
Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps
Adobe Dreamweaver - Adobe Dreamweaver is a proprietary web development tool developed by Adobe Systems.
Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.
Webflow - Build dynamic, responsive websites in your browser. Launch with a click. Or export your squeaky-clean code to host wherever you'd like. Discover the professional website builder made for designers.
SvelteKit - SvelteKit is the official Svelte application framework
BlueGriffon - An HTML editor based on Mozilla rendering engine.