Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Cowboy VS Qase

Compare Cowboy VS Qase and see what are their differences

Cowboy logo Cowboy

Small, fast, modular HTTP server written in Erlang.

Qase logo Qase

Test case management software for QA and development teams that helps you make your product better.
  • Cowboy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-20
  • Qase Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-05-16

Qase.io is a cloud test management application that helps your team to significantly boost testing productivity and organize your software testing efforts.

Test case management

Test suites can help you to organize all your test cases into logical groups. Comprehensive features of test cases allow you to define test case severity, priority; describe pre-conditions, post-conditions, and steps to reproduce test case.

Test plans and runs

You can compose test plans and then run tests. A smart wizard will guide you through the test plan and will help to check all cases at once. Time tracker will show detailed information about time spent for each case.

Team management

Invite your teammates to join and use all power of test case management tools together: run tests, write test documentation, compose test plans.

Cowboy

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

Qase

Website
qase.io
$ Details
freemium $24.0 / Monthly (per user)
Platforms
Browser
Release Date
2018 September

Cowboy features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Qase features and specs

  • Unlimited read-only users: Yes
  • Test case management: Yes
  • Test Plans: Yes
  • Requirements: Yes
  • Dashboards: Yes
  • Integrations: 30+
  • Automation support: Advanced
  • API: Yes
  • Test Review: Yes
  • Defect management: Yes
  • SSO: Yes

Cowboy videos

COWBOY 3 REVIEW: Why I shipped my Cowboy 3 e-bike back.

More videos:

  • Review - COWBOY BIKE - Bad Bike from Belgium | E-BIKE REVIEW
  • Review - COWBOY, the electric bike TESLA or APPLE could have made: review
  • Review - COWBOY vs VELORETTI vs VANMOOF! Which bike should I chose?!?!
  • Review - NEW COWBOY REVIEW - Spin & Cash Generation Explained - TDS Badlands Update
  • Review - COWBOY 4 Review - Design E-Bike im großen Test

Qase videos

Test Case Management - Qase intro

More videos:

  • Demo - Final Qase Demo Testing

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cowboy and Qase)
Web And Application Servers
QA
0 0%
100% 100
HTTP
100 100%
0% 0
Software Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Cowboy and Qase. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cowboy should be more popular than Qase. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cowboy mentions (5)

  • Does the Heroku Ruby Stack use Log4j?
    According to the 'Server' response header, Cowboy is the customer facing web server Https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy. Source: over 2 years ago
  • How to create an Erlang rebar3 release derivation with dependencies?
    ===> sh(git clone -n https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy .tmp_dir636214859401) Failed with return code 128 and the following output: Cloning into '.tmp_dir636214859401'... Fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy/': SSL certificate problem: unable to get local issuer certificate. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Oh Erlang... where have you been all my life?
    RE: HTTP/Web Sockets/TCP/UDP/etc. - check out NineNines libraries: Ranch (TCP Socket Acceptor), Cowboy (HTTP Server), Gun (HTTP client), and CowLib (General HTTP/SPDY library) are pretty good from what I hear. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Build an Elixir Redis Server that's 100x faster than HTTP
    Ranch is a pretty well optimized and battle hardened tcp acceptor. It powers the Cowboy/Phoenix server which scales to extreme level of concurrency and low latency. Cowboy uses ranch to pool and accept connections and I believe it uses {active,once}. https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy https://github.com/ninenines/ranch. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • try-catch vs "let it crash"
    I have a web application which uses cowboy and cachex every so often cachex errors, which means my server returns a 500. Source: over 2 years ago

Qase mentions (2)

  • How I build my Personal Expense Management App and what I learn from it
    Yep! And it's another huge thing for me. The way I started to test application now is by using Qase. This helps me to write manual test cases for my features and when I finish the work, I can run all test cases step by steps and check everything manually. It's nice to have things like this, because when you test something, you can forget small details about the requirements, but with this thing, it's like... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    Qase.io - Test management system for Dev and QA teams. Manage test cases, compose test runs, perform test runs, track defects and measure impact. The free tier includes all core features, with 500Mb available for attachments and up to 3 users. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cowboy and Qase, you can also consider the following products

Uber Bike - On-demand electric bikes for commuting and exploring

TestRail - TestRail provides comprehensive test case management for software testing. Organize your testing, boost productivity, get real-time insights, and track progress toward milestones. Integrates with leading issue tracking and test automation tools.

BikeSharing - Easily borrow a bike anywhere

TestLink - Test & requirements management

Ikea Bekant Standing Desk - New motorized standing desk from Ikea

Kiwi TCMS - The leading open source test case management system, with a lot of great features, such as bug...