Cowboy VS TestRail

Cowboy

Small, fast, modular HTTP server written in Erlang.

TestRail provides comprehensive test case management for software testing. Organize your testing, boost productivity, get real-time insights, and track progress toward milestones. Integrates with leading issue tracking and test automation tools.

Landing page //
2023-01-20

Landing page //
2023-04-27

TestRail’s web-based test case management is used by thousands of great QA and Development teams to efficiently organize, track and manage software testing.

Features

Coordinate functional, exploratory and automated testing
Document your test cases with preconditions, steps, and expected results; attach files and screenshots, and customize fields according to your needs.
Organize test cases in suites and section hierarchies.
Save test case history to track changes; set baselines for multiple branches and versions as needed.
Start test runs, select test cases based on powerful filters.
Boost productivity with personalized to-do lists, filters, and email notifications.
Capture results of testing in real time.
Record estimates and elapsed times for accurate time tracking. Compare to historical data. Forecast completion dates and remaining effort.
Archive test results to protect against modification and support auditing.
Choose between our SaaS solution hosted on our fast and secure servers; or install on your own server.
Integrates with Jira, FogBugz, Bugzilla, Assembla, TFS, GitHub, Ranorex Studio, and many other tools.

COWBOY 3 REVIEW: Why I shipped my Cowboy 3 e-bike back.

TestRail videos

+ Add

Starting to Test with TestRail

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cowboy and TestRail)

Cowboy

TestRail

Web And Application Servers

100 100%

Web And Application Servers

0% 0

Software Testing

0 0%

Software Testing

100% 100

HTTP

100 100%

HTTP

0% 0

QA

0 0%

QA

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Cowboy and TestRail. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cowboy seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cowboy mentions (5)

Does the Heroku Ruby Stack use Log4j?
According to the 'Server' response header, Cowboy is the customer facing web server Https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy. Source: over 2 years ago
How to create an Erlang rebar3 release derivation with dependencies?
===> sh(git clone -n https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy .tmp_dir636214859401) Failed with return code 128 and the following output: Cloning into '.tmp_dir636214859401'... Fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy/': SSL certificate problem: unable to get local issuer certificate. Source: over 2 years ago
Oh Erlang... where have you been all my life?
RE: HTTP/Web Sockets/TCP/UDP/etc. - check out NineNines libraries: Ranch (TCP Socket Acceptor), Cowboy (HTTP Server), Gun (HTTP client), and CowLib (General HTTP/SPDY library) are pretty good from what I hear. Source: over 2 years ago
Build an Elixir Redis Server that's 100x faster than HTTP
Ranch is a pretty well optimized and battle hardened tcp acceptor. It powers the Cowboy/Phoenix server which scales to extreme level of concurrency and low latency. Cowboy uses ranch to pool and accept connections and I believe it uses {active,once}. https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy https://github.com/ninenines/ranch. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
try-catch vs "let it crash"
I have a web application which uses cowboy and cachex every so often cachex errors, which means my server returns a 500. Source: over 2 years ago