So, you're complaining about a company, that hired a second company to host its files for download. Mediafire has been selling file storage / download capability to the internet and businesses, for ages. It's been reviewed by Gizmodo, c/Net, Lifehacker, TechCrunch, and engadget.com, that I know of. Source: over 1 year ago

How? It's not up and operating yet? There is still a waiting list to join when it goes live. Maybe somebody at engadget.com should research before writing articles. Source: over 2 years ago

This is from the DNS server on their VPN server not responding to your computer's DNS requests (aka, your PC is asking it what the IP for engadget.com is and the DNS server on their side isn't responding so your PC doesn't know the IP needed to get there). I made a post about noticing this happen at random on the US-IL#60-68 servers but it seems afew others it's happening on as well. Source: over 2 years ago

I keep getting this warning. Sometimes hitting F5 will load the page fine, sometimes no. I would have to F5 many times for the site to load. it happens on multiple browsers. Here im trying to open engadget.com and petapixel.com. Source: over 2 years ago

Recently, holoride had a roadshow in the US and got to show off its In-Car gaming. The experience was really amazing and this even led to R. Baldwin of http://engadget.com giving a review of the experience. Source: almost 3 years ago

It has, but it wasn't adopted by the pragmatists in that time. It's hard to tell if the early adopters adopted it either - It doesn't show up at all in the 2023 stack overflow survey (nor in the previous two years) - https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2023/#technology-most-popular-technologies - It doesn't show up in questions asked on Stackoverflow since 2008 -... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

> In 2017 I had React projects in production for years. I doubt that. React wasn't stable until 2015, and wasn't mainstream until 2016. > And it only got worse and the overengineering to make it looks fast in the first load is not worth it as modern JS frameworks are faster than React out-of-the-box. Again, Next.js != React; the former builds on the latter, it doesn't replace it nor does it claim to be the same... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

> Prior to Next.js, React was hard to setup and maintain No, it wasn't. > I started using Next.js in 2017. It made React a real production framework In 2017 I had React projects in production for years. > React was hard to setup and maintain and hard to make it go fast (on first load) And it only got worse and the overengineering to make it looks fast in the first load is not worth it as modern JS frameworks are... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

Based on what? https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=python%2Cjava. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

Fair enough, my information is outdated. StackOverflow agrees. [1] [1] https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=django%2Cruby-on-rails. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago