I've read the study from health.com. I'm not impressed with their methodology: They do an incredibly poor job of control groups. It's even in the research you cite. Source: about 1 year ago

I think this subreddit is subject to this in a big way right now. For instance: a very neutral article I posted from health.com has a 50% downvote rate. It's almost as if people are in here just downvoting literally everything to keep it from popping up on Google... Source: over 1 year ago

It could be a wholly new ingredient that hasn't been used before, and no one talked about it for some reason. That's pretty unlikely though. I think that health.com simply got its facts wrong. Source: almost 2 years ago

These sound like pretty generic requests (in a good way — no specialty therapy needed to focus on interpersonal relationships), so you probably just have to see if the therapist gels with you. Go for ease of location and peruse some profiles to start. If money is an object, well then, you’re more limited. If you are open to online, betterhelp.com is completely virtual sessions that might be more affordable…... Source: about 2 years ago

I had been interested in a galacatagogic beer with a lot of herbs, but generically the effect of having a small amount of beer in your blood system can change the flavor of the milk and reduce the amount a newborn might feed. My partner quite enjoyed lactation cookies. I don't remember her recipe but there's a writeup from health.com that might be helpful. Source: over 2 years ago

I wonder if you could construct a hash collision for high pagerank sites in the google (or Bing) index. You would need to know what hash algorithm google uses to store URLs. This is assuming that they hash the URLs for their indexing. Which surely they do. MD5 and SHA1 existed when google was founded, but hash collisions weren't a big concern until later IIRC. You'd want a fast algorithm because you're having to... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

If we (the library) want to provide access to something like the nytimes.com or economist.com websites, what we can do is essentially bulk purchase, at some discount, subscriptions that can be claimed by our users. While this may work for a university campus, it doesn't scale well for a public library for both budgetary and logistical reasons. Source: 7 months ago

I tried to link my friends a NYTimes article but it tells me "www.nytimes.com is blocked. nytimes.com refused to connect. ERR_BLOCKED_BY_RESPONSE" and then automatically tries to load a .onion link in a tor window. Source: 8 months ago

Hello! My goal is to be able to automate tab-closing in Safari. I have hundreds of tab groups in Safari and many contain web pages that I no longer need. It would take me days to organize and manually go through them to close them. For example. I would love to close any tab that contains "gmail.com" or "nytimes.com" etc. Source: 11 months ago

It's lazy to know that the NYT writes an article and google search that article. Go to the browser and type nytimes.com. Source: 12 months ago