Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

JW Player VS VideoJS

Compare JW Player VS VideoJS and see what are their differences

Preferred Patron
Preferred Patron is the top Customer Loyalty Software Program for businesses in any industry of any size. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

JW Player logo JW Player

JW Player is an embeddable media player.

VideoJS logo VideoJS

VideoJS is an HTML5 Video Player, built with Javascript and CSS, with a fallback to a Flash video...
  • JW Player Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-25
  • VideoJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-29

JW Player

Website
jwplayer.com
$ Details
-
Release Date
2004 January
Startup details
Country
United States
State
New York
City
New York
Founder(s)
Adam Fawer
Employees
100 - 249
Edit details

VideoJS

Website
videojs.com
$ Details
Release Date
-
Edit details

JW Player features and specs

  • Customization
    JW Player offers extensive customization options, allowing developers to tailor the video player to fit their branding and functionality requirements.
  • Streaming Quality
    The platform supports adaptive bitrate streaming which provides a smooth viewing experience by adjusting video quality based on user's internet connection.
  • Analytics
    JW Player includes comprehensive analytics tools to track viewer engagement, viewership trends, and performance metrics.
  • Monetization
    It has built-in support for monetization through ads, offering integration with various ad networks and ad technologies.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    JW Player is compatible with multiple devices and platforms, including desktop browsers, mobile devices, and smart TVs.
  • Ease of Integration
    The player can be easily integrated with CMSs, frameworks, and various web technologies through its comprehensive API and developer tools.

Possible disadvantages of JW Player

  • Cost
    JW Player can be expensive, especially for small businesses and individual creators, as it charges based on usage and additional features.
  • Learning Curve
    There can be a steep learning curve for new users who are not familiar with advanced video player settings and customizations.
  • Limited Free Version
    The free version of JW Player has limited capabilities and branding, which might not be sufficient for professional use.
  • Ads Restrictions
    There are some limitations and restrictions when it comes to integrating third-party ad services, which can be a drawback for certain users.
  • Customer Support
    While JW Player offers customer support, some users have reported waiting times and variable quality of service.

VideoJS features and specs

  • Open Source
    VideoJS is open source, meaning it has a large community of developers contributing to its ongoing improvements and features.
  • Cross-browser Compatibility
    VideoJS works smoothly on all modern browsers, ensuring a wide reach and consistent user experience.
  • Plugins and Extensions
    There are numerous plugins and extensions available for VideoJS, allowing for extensive customization and additional functionality.
  • Responsive Design
    VideoJS supports responsive design out of the box, ensuring that videos look good on all screen sizes from mobile phones to desktop monitors.
  • Multiple Video Formats
    VideoJS supports a wide range of video formats such as MP4, WebM, and HLS, providing flexibility in content delivery.
  • Customizable Skins
    The player is highly customizable, allowing developers to adjust its appearance to match the branding of their websites or applications.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    VideoJS has thorough and easy-to-follow documentation, which facilitates quicker implementation and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of VideoJS

  • Performance
    For sites with heavy traffic, VideoJS can sometimes have performance issues, such as longer load times or buffering.
  • Complexity for Beginners
    The extensive customization options may be confusing for beginners who are not yet familiar with web development and video standards.
  • Dependency Management
    VideoJS relies on various dependencies that need to be managed carefully to avoid conflicts and ensure smooth operation.
  • Limited Built-in Features
    Some advanced features may require additional plugins or custom development, as they are not available out of the box.
  • Mobile Browsers
    While VideoJS does support mobile browsers, there can be occasional inconsistencies or issues, particularly with less popular mobile operating systems.

JW Player videos

+ Add

JW Player Employee Reviews - Q3 2018

More videos:

  • Tutorial - របៀប Download video ពី JW Player | How to download video from JW Player
  • Tutorial - How to use JW Player 7 with Wowza Streaming Engine
  • Review - JW Player Review: Daily user of JWPlayer
  • Review - Find Out About the Application Process at JW Player

VideoJS videos

+ Add

Demmo

More videos:

  • Demo - Doraemon Music 2

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to JW Player and VideoJS)

JW Player

VideoJS

Video Platform
53 53%
Video Platform
47% 47
YouTube Tools
43 43%
YouTube Tools
57% 57
Marketing Platform
48 48%
Marketing Platform
52% 52
Video
100 100%
Video
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using JW Player and VideoJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare JW Player and VideoJS

JW Player Reviews

Top 26 Alternatives to Vimeo in 2024: Pricing, Features & More
JW Player is one of the alternatives to Vimeo that offers live streaming at a competitive price. So if you’re just starting live streaming and don’t want to pay the hefty costs to live stream on Vimeo, JW Player is Meta description: Explore the best Vimeo alternatives with our comprehensive 2024 guide. Choose from 26 platforms with detailed insights on features, pricing,...
Source: www.dacast.com
Best Online Video Platforms In 2023
Regarding online video platforms, JW Player can also be a fine option. Whether you’re a content creator or a business, JW Player’s versatile features cater to your videos. Its powerful API and analytics capabilities make it a standout choice for those looking to deliver an exemplary video experience.
Source: medium.com

VideoJS Reviews

We have no reviews of VideoJS yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, VideoJS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 20 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

JW Player mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of JW Player yet. Tracking of JW Player recommendations started around Mar 2021.

VideoJS mentions (20)

  • Stream to Chromecast with resolved, vlc and bash
    For people who like to watch with subtitles, VLC currently doesn't support streaming to chromecast with SRT subtitles.. There are several issues for it and I believe support is slated for the next major version of Chromecast, but not sure when that will be. The typical "workaround" is to reencode the video file to include the subtitles directly, but that sounded like too much work, so I hacked together a static... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Floatplane is a disappointment
    Videojs is superior to basically everything. It's also open source... Source: about 2 years ago
  • Best practice for multiple autoplay videos
    Another option is looking at https://videojs.com/ with the Vimeo video file links. Source: about 2 years ago
  • trying do download a blob video
    I am woring with HTML - I managed to download a (m3u8) video. By inspecting the webpage (videojs.com). Source: over 2 years ago
  • Building a React live streaming app with 100ms
    Now, to display the HLS stream to viewers, we’ll use HLS.js, which we installed earlier. For more UI customizations, you can check out Video.js, which uses HLS.js internally. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing JW Player and VideoJS, you can also consider the following products

Plyr - A simple, accessible and customisable HTML5 media player

Flowplayer - Flowplayer is a video player for web sites.

MediaElement.js - MediaElement.js provides HTML5 audio and video players in pure HTML and CSS.

Wistia - Host, manage, and track your videos with the best video marketing tools in the (known) universe.

FV Player - WordPress's most reliable, easy to use and feature-rich video player.

Vimeo - Vimeo is a social media app that lets you share and capture videos. You can watch new videos in a variety of different categories, and you can share your own content right from your device. Read more about Vimeo.

Loading...