Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

MediaElement.js VS VideoJS

Compare MediaElement.js VS VideoJS and see what are their differences

Preferred Patron
Preferred Patron is the top Customer Loyalty Software Program for businesses in any industry of any size. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

MediaElement.js logo MediaElement.js

MediaElement.js provides HTML5 audio and video players in pure HTML and CSS.

VideoJS logo VideoJS

VideoJS is an HTML5 Video Player, built with Javascript and CSS, with a fallback to a Flash video...
  • MediaElement.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-30
  • VideoJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-29

MediaElement.js features and specs

  • Cross-browser compatibility
    MediaElement.js is designed to work across all major web browsers, providing a consistent media experience regardless of the user's browser.
  • HTML5 and Flash support
    It supports both HTML5 and Flash, ensuring media plays even on older browsers that do not support HTML5.
  • Customizable
    It offers various options for customization, allowing developers to tailor the media player to fit the design and functionality needs of their website.
  • Accessibility
    The player is designed with accessibility in mind, featuring support for screen readers and keyboard navigation.
  • Extensible
    It supports plugins, making it easier for developers to extend functionality as needed.
  • Playlist support
    It has built-in support for playlists, making it easier to manage and play a sequence of media files.
  • Consistent API
    Provides a consistent API for media playback, which simplifies the process of media integration for developers.

Possible disadvantages of MediaElement.js

  • Dependency on Flash
    While it provides fallback to Flash, this can be seen as a downside since Flash is becoming obsolete and presents security vulnerabilities.
  • Performance
    Depending on the complexity and number of media elements, performance can be an issue, especially on resource-constrained devices.
  • Size
    The library can be relatively large compared to other media players, which can affect load times and overall performance of web applications.
  • Complexity
    Though customizable, the process can be complex for developers who are not familiar with JavaScript and the library's configuration options.
  • Limited advanced features
    While it covers basic needs well, it may not have advanced features out-of-the-box that other specialized media players provide.

VideoJS features and specs

  • Open Source
    VideoJS is open source, meaning it has a large community of developers contributing to its ongoing improvements and features.
  • Cross-browser Compatibility
    VideoJS works smoothly on all modern browsers, ensuring a wide reach and consistent user experience.
  • Plugins and Extensions
    There are numerous plugins and extensions available for VideoJS, allowing for extensive customization and additional functionality.
  • Responsive Design
    VideoJS supports responsive design out of the box, ensuring that videos look good on all screen sizes from mobile phones to desktop monitors.
  • Multiple Video Formats
    VideoJS supports a wide range of video formats such as MP4, WebM, and HLS, providing flexibility in content delivery.
  • Customizable Skins
    The player is highly customizable, allowing developers to adjust its appearance to match the branding of their websites or applications.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    VideoJS has thorough and easy-to-follow documentation, which facilitates quicker implementation and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of VideoJS

  • Performance
    For sites with heavy traffic, VideoJS can sometimes have performance issues, such as longer load times or buffering.
  • Complexity for Beginners
    The extensive customization options may be confusing for beginners who are not yet familiar with web development and video standards.
  • Dependency Management
    VideoJS relies on various dependencies that need to be managed carefully to avoid conflicts and ensure smooth operation.
  • Limited Built-in Features
    Some advanced features may require additional plugins or custom development, as they are not available out of the box.
  • Mobile Browsers
    While VideoJS does support mobile browsers, there can be occasional inconsistencies or issues, particularly with less popular mobile operating systems.

MediaElement.js videos

+ Add

youtube

VideoJS videos

+ Add

Demmo

More videos:

  • Demo - Doraemon Music 2

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MediaElement.js and VideoJS)

MediaElement.js

VideoJS

YouTube Tools
33 33%
YouTube Tools
67% 67
Video Platform
30 30%
Video Platform
70% 70
Marketing Platform
29 29%
Marketing Platform
71% 71
JavaScript Framework
100 100%
JavaScript Framework
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using MediaElement.js and VideoJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, VideoJS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 20 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

MediaElement.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of MediaElement.js yet. Tracking of MediaElement.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

VideoJS mentions (20)

  • Stream to Chromecast with resolved, vlc and bash
    For people who like to watch with subtitles, VLC currently doesn't support streaming to chromecast with SRT subtitles.. There are several issues for it and I believe support is slated for the next major version of Chromecast, but not sure when that will be. The typical "workaround" is to reencode the video file to include the subtitles directly, but that sounded like too much work, so I hacked together a static... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Floatplane is a disappointment
    Videojs is superior to basically everything. It's also open source... Source: about 2 years ago
  • Best practice for multiple autoplay videos
    Another option is looking at https://videojs.com/ with the Vimeo video file links. Source: about 2 years ago
  • trying do download a blob video
    I am woring with HTML - I managed to download a (m3u8) video. By inspecting the webpage (videojs.com). Source: over 2 years ago
  • Building a React live streaming app with 100ms
    Now, to display the HLS stream to viewers, we’ll use HLS.js, which we installed earlier. For more UI customizations, you can check out Video.js, which uses HLS.js internally. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MediaElement.js and VideoJS, you can also consider the following products

JW Player - JW Player is an embeddable media player.

Plyr - A simple, accessible and customisable HTML5 media player

Flowplayer - Flowplayer is a video player for web sites.

FV Player - WordPress's most reliable, easy to use and feature-rich video player.

SublimeVideo - The HTML5 Video Player Everyone Deserves.

AngularJS - AngularJS lets you extend HTML vocabulary for your application. The resulting environment is extraordinarily expressive, readable, and quick to develop.

Loading...