Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Marker.io for GitLab VS Zephyr

Compare Marker.io for GitLab VS Zephyr and see what are their differences

Monitask
Employee Monitoring Software with Screenshots, Internet, Activity and Time Tracking featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Marker.io for GitLab logo Marker.io for GitLab

Make it easy for your team and clients to report website feedback into GitLab, without driving developers crazy.

Zephyr logo Zephyr

Zephyr is a small real-time operating system for connected, resource-constrained devices supporting...
  • Marker.io for GitLab Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-14

The ultimate QA tool for bug tracking in GitLab

Report feedback on live websites

Log new issues directly into GitLab without leaving your website via the Marker.io feedback button.

Mark up feedback, bugs and issues visually

Your reporters can draw arrows and write text directly on your website using our built-in annotations tools. No more switching to Photoshop or MS Paint.

Centralize everything in GitLab

Gather bug reports and visual feedback directly into GitLab, even from users like clients who do not have a GitLab account.

  • Zephyr Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-03

Marker.io for GitLab

Website
marker.io
Pricing URL
Official Marker.io for GitLab Pricing
$ Details
paid Free Trial $59.0 / Monthly (10 reporters, Unlimited integrations, Unlimited projects,…)
Platforms
Browser Mac OSX Windows iOS Android Cross Platform Chrome OS JavaScript Wordpress Shopify Magento Slack
Release Date
2017 January
Edit details

Zephyr

Website
zephyrproject.org
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
Platforms
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

Marker.io for GitLab features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Zephyr features and specs

  • Scalability
    Zephyr is designed to be scalable and can support applications from small embedded devices to larger systems with resource constraints.
  • Modularity
    The kernel is highly modular, allowing developers to include only the components needed for their specific application, which helps in optimizing resource usage.
  • Support for Multiple Architectures
    Zephyr supports a wide range of hardware architectures, including x86, ARM, RISC-V, and others, making it versatile for different hardware platforms.
  • Real-time Capabilities
    Zephyr has built-in real-time operating system (RTOS) capabilities, which are crucial for time-sensitive applications and can meet stringent timing requirements.
  • Security Features
    Zephyr includes multiple layers of security, such as memory protection, kernel object permission, and stack overflow protection, to help secure embedded applications.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    Backed by the Linux Foundation, Zephyr has a strong community and ecosystem, which means robust support, extensive documentation, and continuous development.
  • Open Source
    Zephyr's open-source nature enables transparency, community contributions, and the ability for organizations to customize the OS to their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of Zephyr

  • Complexity
    Due to its modular and scalable nature, Zephyr can be complex to set up and configure, especially for beginners who may find the learning curve steep.
  • Limited Middleware
    While Zephyr supports a variety of hardware, its middleware offerings may not be as extensive or mature as those provided by more established OSes like FreeRTOS.
  • Documentation Gaps
    Although the community is active, there are areas where documentation could be more comprehensive and detailed, which can hinder quick adoption and troubleshooting.
  • Resource Intensive
    Given its wide range of features and capabilities, Zephyr can sometimes be more resource-intensive compared to more minimalist RTOS options, which might be a concern for extremely resource-constrained environments.
  • Vendor Lock-in Risk
    While Zephyr aims to be vendor-neutral, there can be dependencies on certain hardware platforms or vendors, which might lead to a form of vendor lock-in.

Marker.io for GitLab videos

No Marker.io for GitLab videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Zephyr videos

+ Add

Zephyr - Rework Review & Build

More videos:

  • Review - Warframe Reviews - Zephyr
  • Review - NIKI - Zephyr ALBUM REVIEW

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Marker.io for GitLab and Zephyr)

Marker.io for GitLab

Zephyr

Productivity
100 100%
Productivity
0% 0
Software Testing
0 0%
Software Testing
100% 100
Error Tracking
100 100%
Error Tracking
0% 0
QA
0 0%
QA
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Marker.io for GitLab and Zephyr. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Zephyr seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Marker.io for GitLab mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Marker.io for GitLab yet. Tracking of Marker.io for GitLab recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Zephyr mentions (11)

  • A Web based Broadcast Assistant
    Combining the Zephyr RTOS stack, running on an affordable nRF52840 Dongle with the power of modern web technologies turned out quite well and it has also allowed us to experiment with multiple subgroups, supported by the specs, but not yet by many devices in the market (at the time of writing at least - be sure to keep an eye out for that!). - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Auracast and multiple subgroups
    Also, it's really great to see that the RFcreations mini-moreph and blueSpy software was able to capture and render this slightly more advanced source and that it was possible to build using Zephyr RTOS and the nRF52840 Dongle. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • A simple Broadcast Audio Source
    The Zephyr RTOS contains some great Bluetooth LE Audio related samples. One of them is the Basic Audio Profile (BAP) Broadcast Source sample. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Capturing the perfect (radio) wave
    I thought about what would be a good first capture, and remembered, I recently made a very simple Bluetooth Low Energy demo using Zephyr and Web, covered in an earlier post. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • It's 2023 why embedded development is so cumbersome?(rant)
    Check out Zephyr OS and Platform IO. Zephyr is part of the Linux foundation and has similarities to Linux with how it performs hardware abstraction (device tree). Platform IO integrates with other frameworks including mbed and Arduino. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Marker.io for GitLab and Zephyr, you can also consider the following products

Instabug - The top apps in the world rely on Instabug for beta testing, user engagement and crash reporting.

TestRail - TestRail provides comprehensive test case management for software testing. Organize your testing, boost productivity, get real-time insights, and track progress toward milestones. Integrates with leading issue tracking and test automation tools.

Buglife - Seriously awesome bug reporting for iOS apps

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

Balto - Easy feedback with screenshot / videos for your beta apps

TestComplete - TestComplete Desktop, Web, and Mobile helps you create repeatable and accurate automated tests across multiple devices, platforms, and environments easily and quickly.

Loading...