Parcel VS Ceph
Compare Parcel VS Ceph and see what are their differences
The PAQATO After-Sales Experience Platform is the growth driver that makes online stores successful for tomorrow.
featured
Parcel
Webpack
17track
rollup.js
AfterShip
esbuild
Vite
Gulp.js
Ceph
Minio
GlusterFS
StorPool
TrueNAS Core
PetaSAN
BeeGFS
XigmaNAS
ParcelBased on our record, Parcel should be more popular than Ceph. It has been mentiond 105 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
You forgot Parcel, which is working on v3 https://parceljs.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 days ago
We are operating within a Node environment, so our first step is to initialize our project by creating a package.json where we define dependencies and commands. Personally, I use both webpack (on top of which @wordpress/scripts is built) and Parcel. While using two different build engines may lack elegance, Parcel’s user-friendly approach compensates for this compared to webpack. Its commands are straightforward,... - Source: dev.to / 8 days ago
Parcel is a fast and zero-configuration web application bundler designed to simplify the build process for modern web projects. It's not limited to web applications, and it can be used to build packages targeting the browser or Node.js. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
At first we wanted to just get rid of all the helper utilities. Keep only the kernel, but this would mean a loss of backward compatibility. We needed some efficient code processing instead with recomposition and tree-shaking. We needed a bundler. But which one? Our testing approach relies on targets, not sources. We rebuilt the project frequently, speed was critical requirement. In essence, we chose a solution... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
It runs using Parcel, very simple and easy to setup. The app has 3 files:. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Ceph stands out in storage technology, offering a scalable and reliable solution where traditional systems fall short. It supports object, block, and file storage in one system, adaptable for various environments including on-premises, cloud, or container-native setups. Key benefits include scalability, enabled by the CRUSH algorithm, allowing for expansion without typical downtime. This makes Ceph suitable for... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
With that being said, you better take a look at something more WAN optimized and more secure, like S3 storage. You can build the S3 storage (and gain immutability) using something like MinIO (https://min.io/) or Ceph (https://ceph.io/en/) or check out Object First Ootbi offerings - https://objectfirst.com/object-storage/ (I work for them). Source: 11 months ago
I believe Ceph [1] could be a good alternative. It can be self hosted and I believe some cloud providers also offer it. Here are some differences between S3 and Ceph [2]. [1] - https://ceph.io/en/ [2] - https://www.lightbitslabs.com/blog/ceph-storage/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Another option is a distributed Ceph cluster https://ceph.io/en/. Source: almost 2 years ago
There's also cool systems like https://ceph.io/en/ that could be efficient if willing to set up and learn. Source: almost 2 years ago
Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.
Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.
17track - All-in-one package tracking
GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.
rollup.js - Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into a larger piece such as application.
StorPool - StorPool is designed from the ground up to provide cloud builders, shared hosting providers and MSPs with the most resource efficient storage software on the market.