POEditor Reviews

1. Ana Tudor

   over 2 years ago
   An amazing tool for translation management

   I enjoy using this platform. It has really made my work as a translator easier. I like that you can see the history of the translations and also the QA check feature is really useful.

2. lbennet675

   | Localization manager | over 2 years ago
   Great localization software

   Easy to use UI, a lot of useful features and a reliable support team!

   🏁 Competitors: Crowdin

   👍 Pros:    Affordable price|Great customer support|Fast support|Excellent features

   👎 Cons:    Nothing, so far
3. Sonia Krugers

   about 4 years ago
   Great localizing experience

   It made my life much easier and helped me get my project done in no time. The features are really straightforward to use and their support team are always ready to give a hand in case you get stuck. I highly recommend it to everyone who needs professional help to manage a localization project effectively!

Sitecake Reviews

POEditor mentions (7)

• A minimal dependency-free translation system for Next.js

  For the purpose of this blog and demo I decided to use POEditor to host my translations. They have a generous free tier which is more than enough for this demo. I created a project, added 2 languages (NL and EN) and added a few translations to it. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago

• Crowdsourcing localization

  For this, I tried to use Angular's build in functionality (@angular/localize) with POEditor. Source: almost 2 years ago

• Recommended way to show content from API for multi language apps?

  Check out POEditor, might be what you are looking for. Source: over 2 years ago

• [Spanish>English] Was sent this meme by a friend and am having a hard time translating it to English. Anything helps, thank you!!

  There's a bunch of others you can find if you google something like "crowdsource app translation" (ex1 ex2 ex3). I hope this helps, and I'll go add these to our wiki, since I also had to hunt them down across the subreddit. Source: over 2 years ago

• I built futurecoder: a 100% free and interactive course for complete beginners

  It would be great if the translation is on a service like https://poeditor.com/, so it can be easier to maintain and recruit other faculty members that aren't so savvy. Source: over 2 years ago

Sitecake mentions (5)

• Maintaining this site fucking sucks

  Use something like this? CMS that generates static html? https://sitecake.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• Publii: Open-source local WYSIWYG static site CMS

  I think that user experience of website builders with wysiwyg and drag and drop UX won over time. Then, as time passed by, website builders become bloated and complex. Once again you needed a professional to maintain your site in site builder. So now simple solutions, static HTML, free or one-time fee CMSs are sexy again. (economy is not good, who wants another subscription?) I know because 14 years ago we have... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

• Best solution that would give clients the ability to edit content on their extremely minimal/simple site?

  Https://sitecake.com/ works with simple html and PHP sites.... Veeeerrrry simple for client edits. Source: over 2 years ago

• Conventional approach to allowing business owner to edit static site?

  May be a suitable use case for https://sitecake.com/. Source: over 2 years ago

• Do you know any No-Code CMS or Data-Base for self-hosted Webflow Sites?

  Other than that: Inline Editing CMS examples: Coast CMS, all you need to do is make the html editable with some classes and you're done. The CMS is kind of outdated though. Other examples: simplyedit.io, surrealcms.com, jocms.net, inlinecms.com, sitecake.com. Source: about 3 years ago