Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

rkt VS Canonical

Compare rkt VS Canonical and see what are their differences

Bunny.net
BunnyCDN is a simple and powerful CDN, offering lightning fast performance for a fraction of the cost with free SSL, Brotli, HTTP/2 and 100% Pay As You Go pricing. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

rkt logo rkt

App Container runtime

Canonical logo Canonical

Canonical is the leading managed private cloud provider. We will build, support and manage your Ubuntu Kubernetes private cloud for only $5-15 per server per day.
  • rkt Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-08
  • Canonical Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-19

rkt videos

+ Add

RKT IPO Review | Is Rocket a Buy for 2020? | Matt Mulvihill

More videos:

  • Review - 2018 Niner RKT 9 RDO - First Look and Build Kit Overview
  • Review - Best Stock Picks Today | RKT Stock 9-2-20

Canonical videos

+ Add

Ubuntu and Canonical: 3 Things You Probably Didn't Know

More videos:

  • Review - Want A Job At Canonical? Write A 5000 Word Essay?!?
  • Review - Mark Shuttleworth - Canonical Vision

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to rkt and Canonical)

rkt

Canonical

Cloud Computing
91 91%
Cloud Computing
9% 9
Cloud Storage
100 100%
Cloud Storage
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100
Storage
100 100%
Storage
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using rkt and Canonical. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare rkt and Canonical

rkt Reviews

5 Container Alternatives to Docker
In 2018, 12 percent of production containers were rkt (pronounced “Rocket”). Rkt supports two types of images: Docker and appc. A selling point of rkt is its pod-based process that works out of the box with Kubernetes (also referred to as “rktnetes”). In Kubernetes, an rkt container runtime can easily be specified:
Source: containerjournal.com

Canonical Reviews

OpenShift alternatives
The biggest advantages of Canonical Kubernetes are flexibility and low cost of deployment. “Charmed Kubernetes” is an exciting operator-based approach to build infrastructures. “Charms” is a collection to seamlessly integrate and manage Kubernetes, container and VM-based applications across hybrid cloud environments. Canonical Kubernetes uses Ubuntu as operating system.
Source: www.ionos.com

What are some alternatives?

When comparing rkt and Canonical, you can also consider the following products

GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

Linode - We make it simple to develop, deploy, and scale cloud infrastructure at the best price-to-performance ratio in the market.Sign up to Linode through SaaSHub and get a $100 in credit!

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk - Quickly deploy and manage applications in the AWS cloud.

containerd - An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability

Jotform - Free Online Form Builder & Form Creator

Loading...