Sounds pretty similar to the situation I found myself in. I discovered a few newsletters/tools: trending insights (free), exploding topics ($39/mo), and trends.co ($300/ yr). Source: 11 months ago

i'm still going on upwork, still subbing to trends.co, explodingideas.co type content, still watching youtube to gain an edge. Source: 12 months ago

After that the hustle team built trends.co which was the premium subscription newsletter,Getting into trends.co costs a whopping $299 but trends stood out from it's competitors through the community engagement feature, unlike other premium newsletter the subscribers can engage with other founders and people in their community. Source: 12 months ago

I don't wanna discourage people from trying to make side income with AI novels done with ChatGPT/Claude, or coloring books done with Midjourney, but that's literally the lowest hanging fruit. Instead - maybe focus on some no-code AI apps you could build. I found plenty of success stories and ideas on sites like trends.co or theaiplug.co. Source: about 1 year ago

I really like the one I recommended above. If you are looking to invest a little I think the best possible one is trends.co but the only issue is that costs $300 a year or something. Source: about 1 year ago

I'm having a very similar issue getting https://brisktest.com/ out there. People complain about things like the speed of their build system, but convincing people that your CI system is faster just seems like an uphill battle. Maybe the era of launching new indie dev tools to developers is over and you just need a massive marketing budget to bombard devs with advertising and lots of sponsored content. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

Hi everyone, I'm Sean I'm the creator of Brisk a new CI/CD tool. I'd love to share a little bit about it with the community and get any feedback you might have. Source: 12 months ago

Paul, if you are interested in speeding up your tests for either Bun or Jest you might be interested in checking out my latest project. At Brisk we keep pre-built workers for your project in our infrastructure so there is no build time that eats in to your test time. This also means there isn't as much of a concurrency penalty that you get with traditional CI services (scaling up to 30 workers only to spend 30... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

We've had a lot of success with Brisk (https://brisktest.com/) doing this exact thing. It keeps our environment running so we don't have to rebuild on every run, kind of like a dev build. It's really fast. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Super interesting you mention “local first CI”. Have a look at Brisk https://brisktest.com/ (I’m the author). It’s designed to work “locally” pre-commit, giving you super fast tests, but then when you push you can also use it in your CI/CD pipeline. We achieve the speed with massive concurrency and pre-built environments, it was built as a drop in replacement for your local test runner. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago